ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
The Selective in vitro Cytotoxicity of
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer treatment often involves significant side effects, necessitating the need for more selective therapies. Methods: This study evaluated the cytotoxic effects of sNPs on cancer cell lines TR-146 (buccal), Caco-2 and HT-29 (colorectal), and MCF-7 (breast), compared to the non-cancerous MCF-10A cells. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the XTT assay at concentrations of 25-500 mg/mL over 3-48 hours. Cellular uptake was quantified via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and fluorescence microscopy, and endocytic inhibitors were used to investigate the uptake mechanism. Results: sNPs induced 30-80% mortality in cancer cells, while non-cancerous MCF-10A cells exhibited negligible mortality (<5%). Male-derived Caco-2 cells were more sensitive to sNPs than female-derived HT-29 cells, suggesting potential sex-based differences. FACS analysis showed 100% cellular uptake in all cancer cells, with TR-146 exhibiting the highest fluorescence intensity. Endocytosis inhibition studies revealed that caveolae-mediated endocytosis played a significant role in sNP uptake, particularly in TR-146 and Caco-2 cells. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the potential of sNPs as selective and potent anticancer agents, warranting further research to optimize their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.