ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Leveraging large language models for automated detection of velopharyngeal dysfunction in patients with cleft palate.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust nasality representation learning for cleft palate-related velopharyngeal dysfunction screening in real-world settings.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and management of cleft lip and palate: An updated review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for maxillofacial prosthodontics: A technological shift in craniofacial rehabilitation- a scoping review.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypernasality, a hallmark of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), is a speech disorder with significant psychosocial and functional implications. Conventional diagnostic methods rely heavily on specialized expertise and equipment, posing challenges in resource-limited settings. This study explores the application of OpenAI's Whisper model for automated hypernasality detection, offering a scalable and efficient alternative to traditional approaches. Methods: The Whisper model was adapted for binary classification by replacing its sequence-to-sequence decoder with a custom classification head. A dataset of 184 audio recordings, including 96 hypernasal (cases) and 88 non-hypernasal samples (controls), was used for training and evaluation. The Whisper model's performance was compared to traditional machine learning approaches, including support vector machines (SVM) and random forest (RF) classifiers. Results: The Whisper-based model effectively detected hypernasality in speech, achieving a test accuracy of 97% and an F1-score of 0.97. It significantly outperformed SVM and RF classifiers, which achieved accuracies of 88.1% and 85.7%, respectively. Whisper demonstrated robust performance across diverse recording conditions and required minimal training data, showcasing its scalability and efficiency for hypernasality detection. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the Whisper-based model for hypernasality detection. By providing a reliable pretest probability, the Whisper model can serve as a triaging mechanism to prioritize patients for further evaluation, reducing diagnostic delays and optimizing resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.