Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Self-made spoon-shaped tool for removal of magnetic foreign bodies from the bladder: a case report.

Zhi Yuan Zhang, Huan Deng, Qi Chun Liang, Yi He Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhi Yuan ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shenzhen Hengsheng Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Huan DengDepartment of Urology, Shenzhen Bao'an Shiyan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Qi Chun LiangThe School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yi He WangDepartment of Urology, Shenzhen Bao'an Shiyan People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Foreign bodies retained in the urethra or bladder present a rare but complex challenge in adult urological practice. Magnetic beads, in particular, are difficult to manage due to their mutual attraction and the large quantities often involved. The presence of such beads complicates removal procedures, especially in male patients with a long urethra. We describe a novel and simple method for retrieving magnetic beads from the bladder. Case description: A 23-year-old man presented with painful urination after inserting approximately 40 small magnetic beads into his urethra for sexual stimulation. Pelvic computed tomography confirmed the presence of multiple metallic bodies in the bladder. Given his preference for a minimally invasive approach and opposition to open surgery, we devised a novel retrieval method. To remove the foreign bodies in a minimally invasive manner, we used orthopedic wire to create a spoon-shaped extractor, which was inserted through a resectoscopic sheath. Using direct cystoscopic visualization, the extractor successfully removed up to six beads at a time. A total of 48 beads were retrieved from the bladder, and the patient was discharged on the second postoperative day, with no complications or residual symptoms. Conclusions: The self-made extractor reduced the risks associated with removing spherical foreign bodies and shortened the overall surgical time. This new device offers valuable insights into the efficient removal of spherical objects from the bladder, making it suitable for primary care settings where conventional instruments may be limited.

Indexed as

cystoscopeforeign bodymagnetic beadsminimally invasive techniquesurgery

Identifiers

PMID40225116
PMCPMC11985533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.