ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
A retrospective cohort study comparing the therapeutic efficacy of three surgical interventions for pediatric flexible flatfoot.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible Flatfoot-Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Clinical Aspects: A Review Focused on Less-Invasive Surgical Treatment in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Treatment of pediatric flatfoot: a systematic review-based consensus and guidelines by CPAM-LRC.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This retrospective study evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes of three surgeries for children's flexible flatfeet. A consensus on the most effective surgical approach is lacking, but it's crucial for improving affected children's function and quality of life. Methods: From June 2013 to August 2019, a total of 31 children (49 feet) with flexible flatfoot were treated. Consecutive patients aged 6-18 years with symptomatic flexible flatfoot (failure of ≥6-month conservative therapy) were included. Exclusion criteria included neuromuscular disorders or prior foot surgery. Surgical allocation was based on surgeon expertise and anatomical severity: subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) group (10 feet), HyProCure implantation at tarsal sinus (HyProCure group) (21 feet), calcaneo-cuboid-cuneiform (Triple C) osteotomy group (18 feet). The general data, preoperative imaging data, postoperative imaging data, and final follow-up imaging data were recorded. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the three groups, including age, sex, and preoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified AOFAS. A total of six parameters on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays of the foot in weight loading were measured and compared. Results: The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the SESA group and HyProCure group were significantly lower than those in the Triple C osteotomy group (P<0.05). However, the duration of correcting flatfoot in the Triple C osteotomy group was better than that in the other two groups (P<0.05). The postoperative follow-up lasted for at least 32 months, with an average of 41 months. The AOFAS scores of all three groups showed significant improvement compared to preoperative scores (P<0.05). As for postoperative imaging measurement indexes among all three groups, AP talo-first metatarsal angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, AP talocalcaneal angle, Talonavicular coverage angle, and calcaneal pitch angle had significantly improved from preoperatively measured values (P<0.05). There was no significant difference observed between clinical outcomes or imaging measurement indexes among these three groups. The incidence rate of tarsal sinus pain was 10% in the SESA group while 14.3% was observed in the HyProCure group; no patient underwent removal of internal fixation due to obvious pain symptoms. In the SESA group, 10% incidence rate was observed for fibular muscle contracture while 16.7% incidence rate was seen for wound pain after the Triple C osteotomy procedure. Conclusions: Compared to the other two groups, the Triple C osteotomy group corrects flatfoot deformities quicker but has a longer surgery and more bleeding. SESA, HyProCure implantation at tarsal sinus, and Triple C osteotomy achieve satisfactory results for symptomatic flexible flatfeet. But due to the study's retrospective nature, more randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings. Level of Evidence: IV retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.