ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Optimal frequency of platelet-rich plasma injections for managing osteoarthritis: A longitudinal study.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of platelet-rich plasma on pain, function, and graft maturation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Cryopreserved umbilical allograft (equicenta® CTM) improves clinical outcomes compared with clinician-selected standard of care in performance horses: a pragmatic prospective controlled trial.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Trial
- Monthly multiple injections of leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (ACP®) for knee osteoarthritis: clinical effectiveness across KL grades, dose-response plateau at four, and 24-month durability.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Anticoagulant-free preparation of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) / fluid platelet-rich fibrin (f-PRF): a pre-clinical comparative performance study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent reviews suggest that PRP injections can improve pain and function more effectively than other treatments; however, consensus on the optimal number of injections is lacking. We aimed to determine the optimal administration frequency and number of PRP injections for management of osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms, to examine long-term effects and structural improvements with PRP, and to determine correlations between clinical outcomes and imaging findings. Methods: This longitudinal study included 167 patients with knee OA, categorized using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system. Participants received up to six PRP injections and were followed-up for 24 months. Pain levels were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS); functional recovery was measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). To determine whether PRP can induce sustained structural improvements, we used the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) to monitor changes in bone-marrow lesions (BMLs). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance to identify significant changes in pain and functional outcomes. Results: VAS and KOOS scores significantly improved after PRP treatment. Patients with KL grades 1 and 2 exhibited maximum pain relief after the fourth injection; those with KL grades 3 and 4 showed optimal results after the fifth injection. Improvements were maintained or enhanced at the 24-month follow-up. The effect size increased as the number of treatments progressed, and especially after the fourth treatment, with a Cohen's d values of -1.22, -1.28, and -0.99 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: PRP injections administered at specific intervals can significantly reduce pain and improve function in patients with OA, with the required frequency depending on disease severity. These findings support the customization of PRP-treatment protocols based on individual patient profiles to maximize therapeutic benefits. Trial registration: This study has been registered with the clinical trial register of the Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials (JMA-IIA00351). Unblinded study registration: This study has been registered with the clinical trial register of the Japan Medical Association Center for Clinical Trials (JMA-IIA00351). Level of evidence: II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.