Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40225029›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Multidimensional evaluation of quality differences for

Yingyue Hou, Guangying Du, Jing Li, Pei Liu, Jinqiang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yingyue HouSchool of Information Engineering, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Guangying DuSchool of Information Engineering, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Jing LiSchool of Information Engineering, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Pei LiuResource Institute for Chinese and Ethnic Materia Medica, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Jinqiang ZhangResource Institute for Chinese and Ethnic Materia Medica, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: Metabolites in Results: A total of 1929 primary and secondary metabolites were identified. Compared to the tree epiphytic and greenhouse environments, 58 primary and secondary metabolites were up-regulated in the stone epiphytic environment. Among these, 7 amino acids and their derivatives were exclusively found as up-regulated primary metabolites, while 18 flavonoids constituted the main up-regulated secondary metabolites. The binding affinities of the 18 flavonoids to the core targets (MAOA and TNF) were superior to those of other up-regulated metabolites, and they can be utilized in quality difference studies, particularly nicotiflorin and isoquercitrin. Stems grown in the stone epiphytic environment showed a superior protective effect on chronic atrophic gastritis cells compared to the other two environments. This was associated with increased binding of differential metabolites to targets such as MAOA and TNF and decreased binding to targets such as SRC and PTGS2. Discussion: The composition and content of metabolites in

Indexed as

Dendrobium officinalemetabolomicsmolecular dockingnetwork pharmacologyquality evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40225029
PMCPMC11985527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.