Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224995›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Feasibility and patient reported tolerance of cryotherapy with Cooral mouth cooling device in patients undergoing radiation therapy (CooRay): a pilot study.

Andrei Bunea, Tiberiu Damian, Hatice Bunea, Tobias Finazzi, Tristan Bauer, Jens Lustenberger, Shirin Davarpanah Jazi, Alexandros Papachristofilou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Multi-institutional, randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a reusable, self-contained cryotherapy delivery device.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrei Bunea *Strahlentherapie-360-Grad, Med360-Grad-Rheinland GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
Tiberiu Damian *Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hatice BuneaClinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias FinazziClinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tristan BauerClinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jens LustenbergerClinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Shirin Davarpanah JaziBrainCool AB, Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden.
Alexandros PapachristofilouClinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is a major side-effect of (chemo)radiation (CRT) of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). This study tries to establish a novel cryotherapy (CyT) method using a mouth care device (MCD; Cooral Methods: Patients were non-randomly assigned to use the MCD after every radiotherapy session for 30-60 minutes. Subjects were asked to answer daily questionnaires assessing tolerability of the intervention. Mucositis was assessed at baseline, once weekly and at weeks 1/3/6 after CRT. The primary endpoint was patient tolerance, defined by the time the MCD was used and the patients' perception. Secondary outcomes were the degree (CTCAE v5.0) and duration of RIOM. Results: Ten patients were eligible with a mean age of 62 years. Four patients received concurrent platinum-based CRT, whereas the others received radiotherapy alone. Overall, 214 CyT sessions were performed (73% of planned CyT sessions). The mean daily CyT duration was 48 minutes (range, 30-60 minutes). All patients reported cooling as comfortable. Nine completed the intervention, one terminated it early due to hypersalivation. No Grade 4 RIOM was observed. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 4 and Grade 2 in 3 cases. Conclusions: The Cooral System was well tolerated, with a duration of application that was acceptable for most patients. We concluded that the MCD can be safely used in patients undergoing CRT. A prospective phase II trial, assessing the efficacy in preventing RIOM, is planned.

Indexed as

Cryotherapy (CyT)head and neck cancer (HNC)oral mucositis (OM)

Identifiers

PMID40224995
PMCPMC11985184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.