ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Comparative survival analysis of stage T1-T2N0M0 lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma using SEER data, and nomogram analysis for early-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Versus Adenocarcinoma in Resected Stage I-III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Does lung adenocarcinoma subtyping offer clinical benefits?-a retrospective population-based cohort study from Sweden.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. It is of great significance to conduct in-depth research on early lung cancer with a better prognosis. This study aimed to use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and survival between early squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) under the same treatment model, and develop a nomogram for early lung SQCC. Methods: This study examined 40,325 cases of stage T1-T2N0M0 lung SQCC and AC from 2004 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used for assessing lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) under various treatments. A nomogram for early-stage SQCC was constructed and validated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: In patients with T1-T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), when only radiotherapy was performed, the LCSS of patients in the SQCC group was worse than that of the AC group [hazard ratio (HR) =1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.079-1.336, P<0.001], and same for 3-year LCSS (55.9% Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with T1-T2N0M0 lung SQCC is worse than that of AC patients. Individualized treatment is recommended in the early stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.