ArticleTranslational cancer research2025
Retrospective study on the prognostic prediction of inflammatory markers and the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in first-line immunotherapy for advanced HER2 negative gastric cancer patients.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in gastrointestinal cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for prognostication in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated cancer patients: a meta-analysis of 13027 patients highlighting nivolumab-responsive renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive value of the preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index for primary chemotherapy resistance risk in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- An integrated body composition- immunonutritional signature for predicting immunotherapy response and prognosis in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER database.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- FAM83A may serve as a potential prognostic indicator for stomach adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- The efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with weekly nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant clinical benefits in the treatment of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative gastric cancer, and are now widely used in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment. However, significant individual variability in the treatment response poses challenges in optimizing therapeutic strategies. Systemic inflammatory biomarkers are gaining attention for their ability to reflect tumor-related inflammation and the immune response balance. These markers could be used to predict treatment outcomes and guide personalized therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral blood inflammatory markers, such as the Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), in patients with HER2 negative advanced gastric cancer undergoing first-line immunotherapy with ICIs. Methods: The clinical data of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with immunotherapy at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were categorized into progressive disease (PD) and effective treatment [complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD)] groups based on their response after two cycles of treatment. The changes in the SII, NLR, PLR, and CAR based on the baseline data and post-treatment measurements were evaluated. The optimal cut-off values for these markers were determined using X-tile software based on their distribution characteristics. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used to assess the prognostic ability of these markers. Results: A total of 142 patients with advanced gastric cancer were included in the study, of whom, 22 had PD after first-line immunotherapy, and 120 had SD. No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics of the patients between the effective treatment group and the PD group (P>0.05). Using X-tile software, the optimal cut-off values for the SII, NLR, PLR, and CAR were 548.22 [hazard ratio (HR): 2.421; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.214-3.710], 3.75 (HR: 3.210; 95% CI: 2.030-5.115), 245.65 (HR: 2.137; 95% CI: 1.577-4.240), and 0.56 (HR: 1.846; 95% CI: 1.388-2.245), respectively. After two cycles of immunotherapy, the NLR, PLR, SII, and CAR values of the patients in the effective treatment (CR + PR + SD) group all decreased significantly. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that the patients with high SII, NLR, PLR, and CAR values had a poorer prognosis in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (P<0.05) than those with low values. Conclusions: Inflammatory markers (i.e., the SII, NLR, PLR, and CAR) can be used to predict the prognosis of HER2 negative advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.