Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224952›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025

Patients' Attitudes to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Global Survey.

Easan Anand, Jalpa Devi, Anna Antoniou, Shivani Joshi, Jaap Stoker, Phillip Lung, Ailsa Hart, Phil Tozer, David H Ballard, Parakkal Deepak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Easan AnandDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-5931
Jalpa DeviDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-2381
Anna AntoniouDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Shivani JoshiDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6712-1486
Jaap StokerRadiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-3784
Phillip LungRobin Phillips Fistula Research Unit, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital, London, UK.
Ailsa HartDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Phil TozerDepartment of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-7267
David H BallardDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-3364
Parakkal DeepakDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-9784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is limited patient involvement in radiological research for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD), despite magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)'s critical role in diagnosis and management. Patient and public involvement is essential for aligning research with patient priorities. This study aimed to gather patient perspectives on the use of MRI in pfCD. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, following Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) guidelines. An online survey, co-developed with a patient representative, included open and closed questions on MRI experiences, advantages, challenges, and the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated reports. This was followed by a virtual session for further exploration of patient views. Thematic analysis was conducted on the data. Results: Forty-seven patients with Crohn's disease (37 with pfCD) from 6 countries participated, with 28/37 (76%) completing the survey. Key themes included patient expectations for MRI, preferences for scan intervals, and report content. Most (93%) wanted MRI reports to compare with previous scans, highlighting fistula changes and new abscesses. A majority (57%) preferred MRI scans annually when well, and more frequently after surgery (64.3% preferred scans at 3 months). Emotional relief was associated with MRI improvements, though access to services and report clarity remained challenging. Interest in AI-generated reports was expressed if clearly explained and validated by professionals. Conclusions: This is the first study exploring patient views on MRI use in pfCD, emphasizing the need for patient-centred MRI reporting and clearer communication. Future work should enhance patient access and validate AI-generated MRI reports.

Indexed as

fistulahealingMRIperianal Crohn’s diseasePPIradiology

Identifiers

PMID40224952
PMCPMC11983384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.