ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025
Patients' Attitudes to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Global Survey.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Patient Understanding of Perianal Fistula MRI Findings Using ChatGPT: A Randomized, Single Centre Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Real-world evaluation of MRI fistula volume as a radiological biomarker of disease activity in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2025Observational
- Imaging in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease: A practical guide for the gastroenterologist.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- AI-Generated Patient-Friendly MRI Fistula Summaries: A Pilot Randomised Study.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is limited patient involvement in radiological research for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pfCD), despite magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)'s critical role in diagnosis and management. Patient and public involvement is essential for aligning research with patient priorities. This study aimed to gather patient perspectives on the use of MRI in pfCD. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, following Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) guidelines. An online survey, co-developed with a patient representative, included open and closed questions on MRI experiences, advantages, challenges, and the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated reports. This was followed by a virtual session for further exploration of patient views. Thematic analysis was conducted on the data. Results: Forty-seven patients with Crohn's disease (37 with pfCD) from 6 countries participated, with 28/37 (76%) completing the survey. Key themes included patient expectations for MRI, preferences for scan intervals, and report content. Most (93%) wanted MRI reports to compare with previous scans, highlighting fistula changes and new abscesses. A majority (57%) preferred MRI scans annually when well, and more frequently after surgery (64.3% preferred scans at 3 months). Emotional relief was associated with MRI improvements, though access to services and report clarity remained challenging. Interest in AI-generated reports was expressed if clearly explained and validated by professionals. Conclusions: This is the first study exploring patient views on MRI use in pfCD, emphasizing the need for patient-centred MRI reporting and clearer communication. Future work should enhance patient access and validate AI-generated MRI reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.