ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2025
Semantic Segmentation of TB in Chest X-rays: a New Dataset and Generalization Evaluation.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable lung-constrained RegNetY-ViT framework for pulmonary tuberculosis classification in chest X-rays with radiological feature-guided neuro-symbolic reasoning.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Automated multi-lesion annotation in chest X-rays: annotating over 450,000 images from public datasets using the AI-based Smart Imagery Framing and Truthing (SIFT) system.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
According to the 2023 World Health Organization report, an estimated 7.5 million people were diagnosed with tuberculosis (TB) in 2022. TB triaging is often performed using chest X-rays (CXRs), with significant efforts invested in automating this task using deep learning. A key concern with algorithms that output image-level labels, in our context TB/not-TB, is that they do not provide an explicit explanation with respect to how the output was obtained, limiting the ability of user oversight. Semantic segmentation of TB lesions can enable human supervision as part of the diagnosis process. This work presents a new dataset, TB-Portals SIFT, which enables semantic segmentation of TB lesions in CXRs (6,328 images with 10,435 pseudo-label lesion instances). Using this data, ten semantic segmentation models from the UNet and YOLOv8-seg architectures were evaluated in a five-fold cross validation study. The best performing segmentation models from each architecture, nnUNet(ResEnc XL) and YOLOv8m-seg and their ensemble were then evaluated for generalization on related classification and object detection tasks. Additionally, several binary DenseNet121 classifiers were trained, and their classification generalization performance was compared to that of the semantic segmentation-based classifier. Results show that the segmentation-based approach achieved better generalizability than the DenseNet121 classifiers and that the ensemble of the models from the two architectures was the most stable, closely matching or exceeding the performance of all other models across the tasks of segmentation, classification, and object detection. The dataset is publicly available from the NIAID TB Portals program after signing a data usage agreement which is available from https://tbportals.niaid.nih.gov/download-data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.