ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2025
Comparison of Quality of Life in Tongue Cancer Patients Following Various Glossectomy Reconstructive Techniques.
Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Head and neck related quality of life following glossectomy among tongue cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tongue cancer treatment often involves glossectomy and flap reconstruction. Since the tongue plays a vital role in swallowing, chewing, speaking, airway protection, and taste, it also plays a major role in the patient's quality of life (QOL) after reconstruction. Therefore, the flap that best preserves QOL should be determined. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE, with a total of 446 articles retrieved. Four studies were included in this integrative review, which all utilized the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire to assess QOL in tongue cancer patients post-glossectomy and flap reconstruction. The articles specifically compared radial forearm free flap to pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, submental island pedicled flap, anterolateral thigh flap, and lateral upper forearm flap. Based on the included articles, no flap significantly preserved QOL. However, a certain flap may be more suitable for a patient based on the patient's preferences, lifestyle, health status, and goals. Therefore, it is important for providers to complete a thorough history and assessment prior to surgery so that the flap chosen upholds the patient's goals and preserves overall QOL.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.