Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224916›Full record

ReviewDermatology research and practice2025

Nail Polishes: A Review on Composition, Presence of Toxic Components, and Inadequate Labeling.

Aislana Cole de Paula, Fabrício Uliana, Eloi Alves da Silva Filho, Priscilla Paiva Luz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic paint, tape, and glass evidence 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aislana Cole de PaulaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4865-668X
Fabrício UlianaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5591-3403
Eloi Alves da Silva FilhoDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-7882
Priscilla Paiva LuzDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9460-546X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nail polishes were developed in 1920, and since 1940, it has been known that these cosmetics contain toxic and sensitizing components. Over the years, nail polishes have undergone several changes in their formulation to avoid this problem, but new components have also been considered toxic and allergenic. The growing demand for gel nails has also been highlighted in cases of allergy to (meth)acrylates, and the biggest concern that was previously related to the presence of toluene sulfonamide-formaldehyde resin (TSFR) in traditional nail polish formulations is now also part of (meth)acrylate-based cosmetics. The beautification caused by nail polish is the main factor behind its constant use throughout the world, but studies have demonstrated its use for other purposes, such as treating fungal diseases, sun protection factor in cancer patients, and as a possible ally in forensic area. This review brings the beginning of the discovery of nail polish and its trajectory to the present day, including its effects on health and its inadequate labeling. Therefore, it is extremely important that legislation monitors the composition of nail cosmetics and that new formulations are studied to make them safe for health and the environment.

Indexed as

cosmeticsformulationnail polishpolymerstoxic components

Identifiers

PMID40224916
PMCPMC11991789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.