Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224897›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing management2024

Digital Competence among Healthcare Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Noora Laakkonen, Erika Jarva, Mira Hammarén, Outi Kanste, Maria Kääriäinen, Anne Oikarinen, Kristina Mikkonen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Technology's Impact on Nurse Manager Practices.Nursing administration quarterly
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noora LaakkonenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Erika JarvaResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-4319
Mira HammarénResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2132-9812
Outi KansteResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-0628
Maria KääriäinenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8295-8172
Anne OikarinenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3509-8912
Kristina MikkonenResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology Faculty of Medicine University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-3428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: New evidence on the digital competencies of healthcare leaders can provide essential knowledge for building training for the leaders to ensure high-quality patient care. Objective: The aim of this mixed-methods systematic review was to identify the current best evidence from qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies on healthcare leaders' digital competence experiences and perceptions and factors associated with it. Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for mixed-methods systematic reviews by including original qualitative and quantitative observational studies and mixed-methods studies published in English or Finnish between January 2012 and January 2024. The studies were retrieved from four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Medic). In total, 4470 articles were screened, 122 were eligible for full-text screening, and 19 articles were included in the review according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: The synthesis of qualitative data identified five main categories that describe healthcare leaders' experiences with digital competencies: (1) the need for developing leader's own, professionals', and patients' competence in the digitalisation of healthcare, (2) the need for expertise in the health IT implementation process, (3) positive perceptions towards technology, (4) negative perceptions towards technology, and (5) ability to act as an advocate to implement technology into practice. Data from the selected quantitative studies presents that factors associated with the digital competence of healthcare leaders include individual characteristics, career characteristics, training, and other factors. Conclusion: This review suggests that developing and supporting healthcare leaders' digital competencies should be considered in healthcare organizations, research, and education to make their digital competencies meet the demands of increasingly digitalising healthcare development work.

Indexed as

LeadershipProfessional CompetenceHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40224897
PMCPMC11919023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.