Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224873›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2024

Predicting New Graduate Nurses' Retention during Transition Using Decision Tree Methods: A Longitudinal Study.

Taewha Lee, Yea Seul Yoon, Yoonjung Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taewha LeeMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-3074
Yea Seul YoonCollege of Nursing, CHA University, Pocheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-3932
Yoonjung JiMo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-9833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although retaining new nurses is imperative for the future of the nursing profession, it remains a challenging task in the healthcare industry. Understanding the career journey of new graduates as they transition from students to nurses is vital. However, longitudinal studies investigating the factors influencing retention during this period are lacking. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify the influencing factors and develop a longitudinal prediction model for new graduate nurse retention. Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted using the New Nurse e-Cohort Study dataset from two survey periods, November-December 2020 and February-March 2022. The participants were categorized into either retention or turnover groups based on their turnover experiences. A decision tree based on classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was utilized. Results: Of the total 586 participants, 463 (79%) were in the retention group. The CART model highlighted that new nurses' retention was significantly associated with younger age, higher readiness for practice (clinical problem-solving) during the nursing program, lower transition shock (such as confusion in professional values, loss of social support, and conflicts between theory and practice), and a higher person-environment fit (person-job fit). The predictive accuracy of the CART model was 79.7%. Conclusion: To retain new nurses, nursing educators and hospital managers should collaborate to prepare nursing students for actual practice, offer support during organizational socialization, and foster healthy professional values for competence in the workplace.

Indexed as

Decision TreesNursesPersonnel TurnoverAdultCohort StudiesFemaleForecastingHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40224873
PMCPMC11919033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.