ArticleJournal of nursing management2024
Toxic Leadership in Emergency Nurses: Assessing Abusive Supervision and Its Team-Level Impacts on Conflict Management and Organizational Commitment.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxic leadership, conscientious intelligence, and quality of nursing work life among registered nurses: A cross-sectional moderation study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Communication Competency in Nurse Managers: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Toxic Leadership in Hospital Nursing and Its Psychological Impact on Staff Well-Being: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Good cop, bad cop? How (in-)consistencies in dual leadership shape employee strain and commitment.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Association between workplace gaslighting, mental health and work life in nurses: a cross-sectional study in Greece.AIMS public health · 2026Article
- Assessing the Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership on Nurses' Presenteeism: A Latent Profile and Mediation Analysis Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional network analysis of toxic leadership behaviors among nursing managers and anxiety-depression-stress among nurses: an exploratory study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Toxic Leadership on Nurse Retention: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Does Structural Empowerment of Nurse Leaders Moderate the Relationship Between Destructive Leadership and Nursing Outcomes?-A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Leadership behaviours and practices assessment among nurse managers in riyadh second health cluster.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Examining the relationship between nursing staff demographics, work characteristics, and toxic leadership in Saudi Arabia: a cross-section approach.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The hidden cost of abusive supervision: rudeness, sabotage, and ethics.BMC psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments suffer from authoritarian and manipulative leadership styles that affect team dynamics, emotional exhaustion, and quality patient care. However, little research specifically explores these toxic leadership effects on conflict management and nurses' organizational commitment. Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the correlations between perceived toxic leadership, conflict resolution strategies, and commitment dimensions among emergency nurses while evaluating conflict tendencies as a mediating mechanism. Methods: A cross-sectional design that included multiple regression and mediation analyses was utilized. The sample consisted of 387 emergency nurses from five major Saudi hospitals surveyed using validated scales that measure perceived toxic leadership, conflict styles, and organizational commitment. Results: High prevalence rates for perceived authoritarian (77%), narcissistic (75%), and unpredictable (63%) leadership were reported. Increased toxicity was positively related to dominating and avoiding conflict styles but negatively related to integrating and compromising strategies. Toxic leadership is also associated with lower affective/normative commitment but higher continuance commitment. Conflict management partially mediated the leadership-commitment relationship, which explained 29% of the total effect. Finally, higher experience and education predicted greater perceived toxicity. Conclusions: The significant correlations between destructive leadership, adverse conflict, and reduced commitment in emergency nurses underscore the need for context-specific leadership training. Fostering supportive environments through multifaceted interventions can counteract toxicity impacts, impart constructive communication techniques, improve nurse well-being, and ensure high-quality patient care. As conflict tendencies and nurse characteristics influence susceptibility to detrimental leadership, tailored programs addressing experience levels are vital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.