Trial reportJournal of nursing management2024
The Impact of Shared Governance Model's Implementation on Professional Governance Perceptions of Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing shared governance and psychological empowerment among nurses in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Designing an antimicrobial stewardship curriculum for nurses to strengthen knowledge and clinical practice.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- German version of the index of professional nursing governance: translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric validation.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Relationship Between Professional Nursing Governance, Nurses' Perceived Care Quality and Job Satisfaction.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Clinical Nurses' Involvement in Decision-Making Process at the Nursing Unit-Based Council Level: A Cross-Sectional Study of Shared Professional Governance in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Still just the nurse? A critical inquiry into nurses' struggles for autonomy in interprofessional hospital teams.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Characterizing the Decision-Making Competency of Nurse Managers: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Nurse managers' managerial innovation and it's relation to proactivity behavior and locus of control among intensive care nurses.BMC nursing · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the shared governance model application on the level of perceived professional governance among clinical nurses in a tertiary hospital in Riyadh. Background: Professional governance continues traditional governance, shared governance, and self-governance. Shared governance (SG) is the engagement of clinical nurses in decision-making at different levels. This empowers nurses, increases job satisfaction, improves clinical outcomes, and enhances patient satisfaction. Methods: This randomised control trial in which researchers distributed the Index of Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) to a random sample of 440 nurses working in a 1200-bed tertiary hospital in Riyadh and divided into experimental and control groups. The intervention included designing and implementing a nursing shared governance model at the hospital level; professional governance was measured before and eight months after implementation. The IPNG was used to measure nurses' perceived level of professional governance before and after the intervention. The sample was divided into experimental and control groups. Results: By comparing experimental and control groups, there was no statistically significant difference between them regarding professional governance subscales and the total IPNG scores before the intervention. At the same time, there was a considerable difference between them after the intervention. Moreover, the scores of the six professional governance subscales and the overall IPNG scores significantly increased after the intervention in the experimental group. They showed no significant difference in the control group. Conclusion: Designing and implementing specific shared governance structures and processes effectively enhanced nurses' perceived level of shared governance at the hospital, as evidenced by significantly higher postintervention IPNG scores. Elements of the shared governance model that proved effective included engaging nurses in decision-making at various organizational levels and empowering their involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.