ArticleJournal of nursing management2024
Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of a Chinese Version Questionnaire for Measuring Emergency Nursing Interruptions.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived Nursing Interruptions During Medication Administration: Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Among Chinese Nurses.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nursing interruptions occur frequently and often have adverse outcomes, threatening patient safety. Emergency departments have a high incidence of nursing interruptions owing to the concentration of critically ill patients and frequent emergencies. Current research mainly focuses on large hospitals and uses observation and interview methods. Therefore, there is a need to develop tools for measuring emergency nursing interruptions. This study develops a survey questionnaire on emergency nursing interruptions. It tests its validity and reliability by building on the conceptual framework of emergency nursing interruption proposed in the literature. Specifically, we develop a test version of the emergency nursing interruption survey questionnaire using a Delphi expert inquiry and preinvestigation. We selected 1047 emergency nurses in 22 provinces and autonomous regions of China to participate in the survey by completing the questionnaire between June and July 2023 to evaluate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The final questionnaire comprised 26 items across 5 dimensions-sources, types, interrupted nursing activities, consequences of interrupted nursing activities, and management of nursing interruptions. The content validity indexes were 0.948 at scale level and 0.842-1.000 at item level. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to extract five common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 66.550%. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated a good model fit. Cronbach's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.