Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224755›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2024

Licensed Practical Nurses' (LPNs') Evaluations of the Attractiveness of Work and Wellbeing at Work: A Cross-Sectional Nationwide Study.

Mia Roos, Juho Kopra, Terhi Tevameri, Sari Viinikainen, Lauri Kuosmanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mia RoosUniversity of Eastern Finland (UEF) Department of Nursing Science, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4077-9675
Juho KopraUniversity of Eastern Finland (UEF) School of Computing, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-8936
Terhi TevameriEconomic Development and Employment, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0009-0005-9822-4241
Sari ViinikainenTehy-The Union of Health and Social Care Professionals in Finland, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-4633
Lauri KuosmanenUniversity of Eastern Finland (UEF) Department of Nursing Science, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-2611

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe challenges in recruiting and retaining healthcare workers exist on a global level and are especially noticeable in elderly care services. Previous studies have not assessed how the attractiveness of a job is related to wellbeing at work among licensed practical nurses (LPNs) even though these professionals are vital in providing care to the elderly. Objective: The purpose of this study is to define factors that affect LPNs' attractiveness of work and wellbeing at work. Design: A cross-sectional survey study. Methods: An online survey for LPNs working in Finland was conducted. Criteria for a good workplace (CFGW), measuring the attractiveness of work and wellbeing at work, were utilized. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. Cronbach's alpha values were tested to assess internal consistency ( Results: The core group, LPNs' wellbeing at work ( Conclusions: The core group, wellbeing, is an exceptionally important for the LPNs attractiveness of work. The LPNs' wellbeing at work is supported by the quality of care and reconciliation of work and private life.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionLicensed Practical NursesWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40224755
PMCPMC11918497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.