ArticleJournal of nursing management2024
Resilience and Flexibility for Clinical Nurses: A Latent Class Analysis.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the clinical nurses' perceptions and coping strategies of nursing research: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Clinical nurses as digital guardians: unlocking the key determinants of digital resilience in the AI era.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Associations between family care, organizational support, psychological resilience, and professional quality of life of emergency department nurses in China: A cross-sectional study.Belitung nursing journal · 2026Article
- Correction to "Resilience and Flexibility for Clinical Nurses: A Latent Class Analysis".Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Resilience and nursing care quality in emergency departments: a 2024 study in Kermanshah, Iran hospitals.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The relationship between psychological flexibility and health locus of control in patients after total hysterectomy: a latent class analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore potential resilience and psychological flexibility patterns in nurses and analyze the effects of related factors such as growth mindset and professional recognition of categories. Background: Resilience and psychological flexibility can help nurses resist occupational pressure and play essential roles in promoting personal growth and professional development. Methods: A latent category approach was used to examine the patterns of heterogeneity in resilience and flexibility among 805 nurses. Differences in the influences related to resilience and flexibility were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regressions, with demographic information, growth mindset, and career recognition as covariates. Results: Participants were divided into three potential categories: toughness-flexible (32.8%), power-deficit-emotional (23.1%), and toughness-rigid (44.1%). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that monthly income, mode of employment, growth mindset, and professional identity were influential factors in the potential categories of nurse resilience and flexibility. Conclusion: One cohort of nurses had high resilience and low flexibility, and psychological rigidity was related to the fact that the monthly income was less than RMB 5,000 and the contractual mode of employment. An excellent growth mindset and a high professional identity indicate that nurses are resilient and flexible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.