Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224677›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Real-world use of complement inhibitors for haemolytic uraemic syndrome: an analysis of the European Rare Kidney Disease Registry cohort.

Aleksandra Vujović, Anne-Laure Sellier-Leclerc, Maria Cristina Mancuso, Olivia Boyer, Atif Awan, Antonio Gargiulo, Sebastian Loos, Marc Fila, Augustina Jankauskiene, Gema Ariceta and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Aleksandra VujovićDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anne-Laure Sellier-LeclercService de Néphrologie Pédiatriques, Centre de Référence Des Maladies Rénales Rares Néphrogones Filières Maladies Rares ORKID et ERKNet, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, Lyon, France.
Maria Cristina MancusoDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Olivia BoyerPaediatric Nephrology, Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, MARHEA Reference Centre, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, France.
Atif AwanDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Temple Street, Ireland.
Antonio GargiuloDivision of Paediatric Nephrology and Dialysis, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sebastian LoosDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marc FilaDivision of Paediatric Nephrology and Dialysis, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Centre De Référence Des Maladies Rénales Rares du Sud-Ouest (SORARE), Montpellier, France.
Augustina JankauskienePaediatric Centre, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gema AricetaPaediatric Nephrology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nele KanzelmeyerDepartment of Paediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Children's Hospital, Hannover, Germany.
Enrico VidalDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, Department of Women's and Child's Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Maria Van DyckDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tanja Kersnik LevartDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Naděžda ŠimánkováDepartment of Paediatrics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Stephane DecramerDepartment of Paediatric Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Nephrology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Jonas HofstetterDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marina VivarelliDivision of Paediatric Nephrology and Dialysis, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Savino SciasciaDivision of Nephrology, University of Torino-Ospedale HUB Torino Nord, Turin, Italy.
Nicole C A J van de KarDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Franz SchaeferDivision of Paediatric Nephrology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
ERKNet TMA Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although terminal complement inhibitors transformed the prognosis of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) from dismal to favourable, treatment approaches vary due to the intermittent disease nature and high costs. Occasionally, complement inhibition is applied in infectious (i)HUS. We aimed to examine real-world C5 inhibitor use and its impact on patient outcomes. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used longitudinal data from the European Rare Kidney Disease Registry, collected from 76 nephrology centres across 24 European countries between January 1, 2019 and January 31, 2024. Eligible patients had aHUS or iHUS with onset after January 1, 2011, and/or documented C5 inhibitor use. Exclusions included complement-unrelated HUS, post-transplant HUS, and prophylactic C5 inhibitor use around kidney transplantation. Data, derived from medical records and focused queries, were used to assess C5 inhibitor duration, via time-to-event analysis, and kidney function based on annual creatinine levels. Findings: A total of 238 aHUS and 472 patients with iHUS were included in the analysis. C5 inhibition was applied in 76.5% of aHUS and 18.4% of iHUS, with major utilisation differences between countries (p < 0.0001) and less common use in female patients with aHUS (p = 0.0022). Median (interquartile range) treatment duration was 16.1 (3.6-41.2) months in aHUS and 9 (7-32) days in iHUS. After five years, 56% of genetic, 28% of anti-complement factor H (anti-CFH) antibody-mediated, and 23% of aHUS cases with no identified cause remained on treatment. The long-term (>7 years) risk of treatment resumption was 35% in genetic, 15% in aHUS of no identified cause, and 0% in anti-CFH antibody-mediated aHUS. Post-withdrawal aHUS relapses were mostly mild and did not lead to permanent kidney function impairment, ultimately leading to long-term treatment withdrawal in 92.5% of discontinued cases. Interpretation: Currently, C5 inhibitors are administered in three-quarters of newly diagnosed patients with aHUS in Europe, with varied utilisation and discontinuation practices. Treatment withdrawal is common and safe, although relapses may occur, particularly in genetic aHUS. However, baseline disease severity, selective use in expert centres, and indication bias affect outcome comparability. Findings must be considered in the context of patient-specific factors and disease severity at the time of treatment decisions. Funding: This research was supported by the European Reference Network for Rare Kidney Diseases, funded by the European Union within the framework of the "EU4Health Programme 2021-2027".

Indexed as

Complement inhibitorEuropean Rare Kidney Disease RegistryHaemolytic uraemic syndromePost-withdrawal relapseTreatment discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID40224677
PMCPMC11987679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.