ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Antimicrobial prescription patterns in tertiary care centres in India: a multicentric point prevalence survey.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of antimicrobial use among patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital: A prospective observational study using World Health Organization AWaRe and Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Observational
- Analysis of Infection Types, Pathogens, Antimicrobial Treatment, and Clinical Outcomes Data in Hospitalised Patients: Comprehensive Online Database for Antimicrobial Resistance (CODAR) Retrospective Pilot Study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Article
- Association of a Hospital-Wide Integrated Stewardship Intervention with Hospital-Acquired Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infection Incidence Density: A Large-Scale Interrupted Time-Series Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Laboratory-Negative Results as a Marker of Diagnostic Gap: A Retrospective Study in the One Health Context.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Strategies and Recent Advances in Tackling Antibacterial Resistance in India: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, emphasizing the need for Point Prevalence Surveys (PPS) to understand antibiotic use and resistance. This study assesses antibiotic use patterns and resistance in tertiary care hospitals across India to inform AMR interventions. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted over two weeks between May and August 2023 in eight Indian tertiary care hospitals. The survey comprised two parts: the ward form, which captured ward details (name, specialty, bed count, and antibiotic use), and the patient form, which documented demographics, antimicrobial therapy, and microbiological data, including redundant coverage and designated antibiotics. Rationality was assessed using 50 forms from each site. Data were collected digitally by trained team of surveyors. The study included hospitalized patients on systemic antimicrobials, excluding outpatient, day-care dialysis patients, and those on topical antibiotics. Findings: Among 3974 patients in eight hospitals, adult surgical and pediatric medical wards had the highest antibiotic usage. Of 4248 prescriptions, the most common antibiotics were ceftriaxone (14.9%, 95% CI: 10.4%, 18.4%), metronidazole (10.2%, 95% CI: 6.0%-11.2%), amikacin (8.7%, 95% CI: 6.3%-11.3%), piperacillin/tazobactam (8.7%, 95% CI: 9.1%-10.5%), and meropenem (7.1%, 95% CI: 5.2%-9.5%). Antibiotics were categorized as 'Watch' (57.03%), 'Access' (32.67%), and 'Reserve' (5.08%). Primary indications were community-acquired infections (30.6%, 95% CI: 25.1%-32.5%) and surgical prophylaxis (31%, 95% CI: 29.8%-36.9%). HAIs prevalence was 13.3% (95% CI: 9.3%-15.4%), with majority of use being empiric (48.96%, 95% CI: 35.1%-58.8%). Common isolates included Interpretation: The SASPI (Society of Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices in India)-led survey underscores the high use of antibiotics in the included tertiary care centers emphasizing the need for point prevalence surveys to guide antimicrobial stewardship programs. It highlights the importance of ongoing AMR surveillance, improved stewardship, and education to refine prescribing practices, targeting hospital-acquired infections, and reducing unnecessary treatments. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.