Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224651›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

A Detailed Guide to Recording and Analyzing

Fatiha Atanjaoui, Thomas J Kleist, Juan Camilo Barbosa-Caro, Michael M Wudick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatiha AtanjaouiHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thomas J KleistStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MI, USA.
Juan Camilo Barbosa-CaroHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael M WudickHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Physiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recordings of electric potential changes on plant surfaces have been utilized to identify the components and mechanisms involved in the formation and transmission of systemic signals elicited by stimuli such as herbivory, wounding, or burning. The recorded responses, commonly referred to as slow wave or variation potentials, exhibit striking variability in their waveform. The extent to which this variability is due to differences in experimental procedures or plant biological variability remains unclear. Here, we provide a detailed and robust protocol refined from years of experience in conducting leaf surface potential recordings of

Indexed as

Data analysis pipelineElectrode preparationLeaf numberingLong-distance signalingSurface potential recordings

Identifiers

PMID40224651
PMCPMC11986695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.