Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224644›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Voice attractiveness affects cooperative behavior in the Stag Hunt Game: evidence from neural electrophysiology.

Xianjia Wang, Wei Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xianjia WangHubei Province Key Laboratory of Systems Science in Metallurgical Process, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wei CuiHubei Province Key Laboratory of Systems Science in Metallurgical Process, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The halo effect of attractiveness influences not only physical appearance but also vocal characteristics, impacting people's lives and behaviors. Previous research has shown that voice attractiveness may affect decision-making and social interactions, but its influence on cooperative behavior has not been thoroughly investigated. Methods: This study used neurophysiological methods, specifically EEG, to examine the impact of voice attractiveness on cooperative behavior in the Stag Hunt Game. Participants played a two-person version of the game with a virtual partner whose voice was either highly attractive or less attractive. EEG data was recorded during the game, focusing on brain responses during the voice processing phase and outcome feedback phase. Results: The results revealed a "beauty premium" effect: participants were more likely to cooperate when paired with a highly attractive voice. Electrophysiological data showed that high-attractiveness voices elicited larger P2, P3, and LPC amplitudes and smaller theta oscillations during the voice processing phase. During the outcome feedback phase, both highly attractive voices and gain feedback resulted in smaller FRN amplitudes and larger P300 amplitudes. In contrast, under less attractive conditions, loss feedback triggered larger theta oscillations. Discussion: These findings suggest that voice attractiveness significantly influences cooperative behavior in social decision-making contexts. The neural responses indicate that the attractiveness of a voice can modulate both early sensory processing (P2, P3, LPC) and feedback evaluation (FRN, P300, theta). This study highlights the role of voice attractiveness in shaping cooperative behavior and provides new insights into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying social decisions.

Indexed as

decision makingEROERPStag Hunt Gamevoice attractiveness

Identifiers

PMID40224644
PMCPMC11985797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.