Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224566›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Mutualisms as a framework for multi-robot collaboration.

Alexander A Nguyen, Mauriel Rodriguez Curras, Magnus Egerstedt, Jonathan N Pauli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander A NguyenSamueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Mauriel Rodriguez CurrasDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Magnus EgerstedtSamueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jonathan N PauliDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biology has inspired robotics since its inception as an academic discipline. However, the use of ecological principles in robotics is still relatively rare and in this paper, we explore how such principles can not only be of relevance to robotics, but can reciprocally lead to new insights into ecology. In particular, we investigate how mutualisms-jointly beneficial interactions between members of different species-can inform collaborative architectures for multi-robot systems comprised of different types of robots. To better understand how mutualisms can have practical relevance in robotics, we present a case study where the landscape heterogeneity, i.e., the configuration of the landscape, is varied, and we measure the efficiency of robots functioning independently or involved in a mutualism. We show that landscape composition impacts the benefits of forming mutualisms, which, in turn, has implications for mutualism emergence and stability in ecology. Moreover, through this case study, the concept of fitness and its components can be introduced for engineered systems, leading to notions of longevity, task fecundity, and, ultimately, robot fitness.

Indexed as

fitnessheterogeneitylandscapemulti-robot systemsmutualisms

Identifiers

PMID40224566
PMCPMC11985437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.