Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224514›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2025

Review of acamprosate pharmacokinetics and dosing strategies.

Lauren Steil, Dale Terasaki, Rebecca Reiss, Michael Deaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren SteilPGY-1 Pharmacy Resident, Denver Health & Hospital Authority, Department of Pharmacy, Denver, Colorado.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3300-9892
Dale TerasakiAddiction Medicine Specialist, Denver Health & Hospital Authority, Department of Behavioral Health, Denver, Colorado.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-1608
Rebecca ReissPsychiatric Pharmacist - Clinical Specialist, Denver Health & Hospital Authority, Department of Pharmacy, Denver, Colorado.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1015-7809
Michael Deaney(Corresponding author) PGY-2 Infectious Diseases Pharmacy Resident, Denver Health & Hospital Authority, Department of Pharmacy, Denver, Colorado, Michael.deaney@dhha.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8576-4964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, contributing to 5% of annual deaths. Although some literature suggests that acamprosate is an effective treatment for AUD, its traditional dosing regimen of 2 tablets 3 times daily may challenge patient adherence. This review compares clinical and pharmacokinetic data of different acamprosate dosing regimens to provide guidance on optimal dosing for treating AUD. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for articles published before March 2024. Relevant randomized controlled trials, case reports, and pharmacokinetic studies were identified from PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar. Results: Three dosing regimens were identified, including traditional dose, reduced dose, and reduced frequency. Definitive conclusions regarding the comparative efficacy of these regimens cannot be drawn. However, reduced doses appear safe and efficacious in small clinical trials, and a pharmacokinetic study found reduced frequency to be bioequivalent to traditional doses. Discussion: Adherence to pharmacotherapy for AUD is challenging and difficult to measure. A reduced dose regimen may be appropriate for patients who struggle with the pill burden of traditional doses, though the varying number of tablets required at different times may still pose adherence issues. The bioequivalence of reduced frequency dose to traditional dose suggests it could be a viable option for patients who find a 3-time daily frequency cumbersome. However, the lack of data on the clinical efficacy of reduced frequency makes it difficult to recommend as a primary regimen. Further research is needed to determine if either reduced dose or reduced frequency regimens could improve patient adherence compared with a traditional dose.

Indexed as

acamprosateadherencealcohol use disorderpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID40224514
PMCPMC11993144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.