ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Enhanced diagnostic value of adding 3D MR neurography sequence to routine lumbar spine MRI protocol: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates whether the inclusion of a 3D MR neurography sequence in the routine lumbar spine MRI protocol improves the diagnostic yield in patients presenting with low back pain, radiculopathy, or limb weakness. Methods: A total of 277 lumbar spine MRIs with positive MR neurography findings were retrospectively reviewed. Standard MRI images (excluding neurography) were first categorized as normal, nearly normal, or abnormal. Subsequently, MR neurography findings were categorized into five groups i.e. Insignificant findings, Findings that increased diagnostic confidence in standard MRI results, Improved appreciation of disease severity, helped in better delineation of symptomatic site in multilevel disease, and those with significant findings seen only on MR neurography.Statistical analysis was conducted using a two-sample proportion z-test to compare the diagnostic value of standard MRI alone versus MRI with neurography. Results: The addition of MR neurography increased diagnostic yield in over 87 % of cases (241/277 patients). Furthermore, in 20.5 % of cases (57/277), pathology was identified exclusively on MR neurography. Conclusion: Adding MR neurography to routine lumbar spine MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, offering a symptom-targeted evaluation of spinal nerves. This addition holds promise for improving the workup of patients with low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.