Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224502›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Effect of tourniquet time and nerve diameter change on nerve damage in upper extremity surgery interventions.

Nezih Sertoz, Zeynep Cagiran, Kazım Koray Ozgul, Asli B Turhan, Semra Karaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nezih SertozDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Zeynep CagiranDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City USA.
Kazım Koray OzgulAgri Education and Research Hospital Department of Anesthesiology, Agri, Turkey.
Asli B TurhanCigli Education and Research Hospital Department of Neurology, Izmir, Turkey.
Semra KaramanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peripheral nerve damage is the most common and most frightening complication after a peripheral nerve block procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different tourniquet durations on the sensory, motor, and sympathetic functions of peripheral nerves in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery by measuring nerve diameters under ultrasound guidance and performing nerve conduction studies to evaluate the effects on nerve damage in distal forearm. Methods: This study was conducted on ASA I-III patients between the ages of18 and70 who were scheduled to undergo surgery on the mid and distal forearm. All patients underwent brachial plexus block via an axillary approach using USG and a nerve stimulator Prior to the application of the block, the diameters of the median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves were measured under USG guidance.The same assistant personnel injected 7 ml of bupivacaine and lidocaine mixture into each nerve (median, radial, ulnar). Local anesthetic(LA) to spread along the nerve sheath, the diameters of each nerve sheath were measured and recorded again by USG. Nerve conduction studies using EMG were performed by the same researcher before surgery and 1month after surgery to evaluate for nerve damage. Results: The study consisted of 61 patients. Of the patients, 42.6 % were aged 40-60 years, and 54.1 % were women. One patient was switched to general anesthesia due to block failure, and the patient was excluded from the study. Three patients experienced complications (prolonged sensory block of 15 h in two patients, and sensory paralysis of one month in one patient. The tourniquet times of the patients were almost equal.There was a statistically significant difference between the first and final measurements of patients' Median Nerve Diameter, Radial Nerve Diameter, Ulnar Nerve Diameter, Median Nerve Sensory Amplitude, Ulnar Nerve Sensory Amplitude, Radial Nerve Sensory Amplitude, Ulnar Nerve Motor Amplitude, Median Sensory Latency, Ulnar Sensory Latency, and Radial Sensory Latency(p < 0.05).). In both patients with and without DM, the difference between the first and last measurements of Median Nerve Diameter, Radial Nerve Diameter, Ulnar Nerve Diameter, Median Sensory Latency, and Radial Sensory Latency was statistically significant (p < 0, 05). Conclusion: Involuntary intraneural injections can occur with peripheral nerve blocks. When the effect of the increase in nerve diameter due to local anesthesia and appropriate tourniquet duration on nerve damage is evaluated by nerve conduction studies, although it causes partial impairment of nerve function (slowing of nerve conduction, decrease in amplitude), it generally does not cause permanent nerve damage.

Identifiers

PMID40224502
PMCPMC11992523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.