Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224496›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology letters2025

Advancing the Spatiotemporal Dimension of Wildlife-Pollution Interactions.

Jack A Brand, Jake M Martin, Marcus Michelangeli, Eli S J Thoré, Natalia Sandoval-Herrera, Erin S McCallum, Drew Szabo, Damien L Callahan, Timothy D Clark, Michael G Bertram and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jack A BrandDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-941X
Jake M MartinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.
Marcus MichelangeliDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-6759
Eli S J ThoréDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-8404
Natalia Sandoval-HerreraDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.
Erin S McCallumDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5426-9652
Drew SzaboCentre of Excellence in Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-9218
Damien L CallahanSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds 3216, Australia.
Timothy D ClarkSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds 3216, Australia.
Michael G BertramDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.
Tomas BrodinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 907 36, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical pollution is one of the fastest-growing agents of global change. Numerous pollutants are known to disrupt animal behavior, alter ecological interactions, and shift evolutionary trajectories. Crucially, both chemical pollutants and individual organisms are nonrandomly distributed throughout the environment. Despite this fact, the current evidence for chemical-induced impacts on wildlife largely stems from tests that restrict organism movement and force homogeneous exposures. While such approaches have provided pivotal ecotoxicological insights, they overlook the dynamic spatiotemporal interactions that shape wildlife-pollution relationships in nature. Indeed, the seemingly simple notion that pollutants and animals move nonrandomly in the environment creates a complex of dynamic interactions, many of which have never been theoretically modeled or experimentally tested. Here, we conceptualize dynamic interactions between spatiotemporal variation in pollutants and organisms and highlight their ecological and evolutionary implications. We propose a three-pronged approach-integrating

Identifiers

PMID40224496
PMCPMC11984497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.