ReviewACS omega2025
Skin and Wound Healing: Conventional Dosage versus Nanobased Emulsions Forms.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Formulation Attributes and Preclinical Wound Healing Outcomes of Natural Product Based Nanoemulsions: A Systematic Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Pooled it
- Proteomic Stability and Ex Vivo Compatibility of a Processed Phospholipoproteic Secretome-Derived Formulation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- β‑Caryophyllene-Loaded Sunflower Oil Nanoemulsion Incorporated into Chitosan Films for Wound Healing Applications.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Enhanced Skin Delivery of Amphotericin B: Development and Evaluation of Polymeric Nanoparticles Using a Porcine Ear Model.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems for Antithrombotic Therapy: A Systematic Review.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The skin plays a crucial role in the body's homeostasis through its thermoregulation functions, metabolic activity, and, mainly, its barrier function. Once this system has its homeostasis disturbed, through the promotion of tissue discontinuity, an injury happens and a restoration process starts. Different products can be used to promote, accelerate, or stimulate the healing process, such as hydrogels, emulsions, and ointments (main conventional formulations). Despite the historical use and wide market and consumer acceptance, new systems emerged for wound management with the main challenge to overcome conventional form limitations, in which nanosystems are found, mainly nanobased emulsion forms (nano- and microemulsions, NE and ME). Here, we discuss the skin function and wound healing process, highlighting the cellular and molecular processes, the different wound classifications, and factors that affect physiological healing. We also investigated the recent patents (2012-2023) filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, where we found few patents for conventional forms (hydrogels = 5; emulsions = 4; ointments = 6) but a larger number of patents for nanobased emulsions filed in this time (NE = 638; ME = 4,072). Furthermore, we address the use of nanobased emulsions (NE and ME) and their particularities, differences, and application in wound treatment. This work also discusses the challenges, bottlenecks, and regulatory framework for nanosystems, industrial, academic, and government interest in nanotechnology, and future perspectives about this key factor for the nanosystems market and consumer acceptance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.