Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224422›Full record

ReviewACS omega2025

Skin and Wound Healing: Conventional Dosage versus Nanobased Emulsions Forms.

João Vitor Vicente-da-Silva, Juliana Oliveira da Silva Lopes Pereira, Flávia Almada do Carmo, Beatriz Ferreira de Carvalho Patricio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João Vitor Vicente-da-SilvaPostGraduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences - Pharmacology, Biomedical Institute, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20211-040, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-2914
Juliana Oliveira da Silva Lopes PereiraPharmaceutical and Technological Innovation Laboratory, Department of Physiological Sciences - Pharmacology, Biomedical Institute, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20211-040, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7268-1371
Flávia Almada do CarmoLaboratory of Pharmaceutical Industrial Technology, Department of Drugs and Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-971, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-9070
Beatriz Ferreira de Carvalho PatricioPostGraduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Physiological Sciences - Pharmacology, Biomedical Institute, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20211-040, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2477-9798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The skin plays a crucial role in the body's homeostasis through its thermoregulation functions, metabolic activity, and, mainly, its barrier function. Once this system has its homeostasis disturbed, through the promotion of tissue discontinuity, an injury happens and a restoration process starts. Different products can be used to promote, accelerate, or stimulate the healing process, such as hydrogels, emulsions, and ointments (main conventional formulations). Despite the historical use and wide market and consumer acceptance, new systems emerged for wound management with the main challenge to overcome conventional form limitations, in which nanosystems are found, mainly nanobased emulsion forms (nano- and microemulsions, NE and ME). Here, we discuss the skin function and wound healing process, highlighting the cellular and molecular processes, the different wound classifications, and factors that affect physiological healing. We also investigated the recent patents (2012-2023) filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, where we found few patents for conventional forms (hydrogels = 5; emulsions = 4; ointments = 6) but a larger number of patents for nanobased emulsions filed in this time (NE = 638; ME = 4,072). Furthermore, we address the use of nanobased emulsions (NE and ME) and their particularities, differences, and application in wound treatment. This work also discusses the challenges, bottlenecks, and regulatory framework for nanosystems, industrial, academic, and government interest in nanotechnology, and future perspectives about this key factor for the nanosystems market and consumer acceptance.

Identifiers

PMID40224422
PMCPMC11983225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.