Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224379›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Patient Satisfaction with a Novel Daily Toric Contact Lens in Individuals with Previous Lens Failures.

Mylan T Nguyen, Melissa H Wright, Brad Hall, Phillip B Brunson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mylan T NguyenMann Eye Institute and Laser Centers, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-4435
Melissa H WrightMann Eye Institute and Laser Centers, Houston, TX, USA.
Brad HallSengi, Penniac, NB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4097-6310
Phillip B BrunsonMann Eye Institute and Laser Centers, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5616-9620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The primary purpose of this study is to assess the comfort and vision of Dailies Total1 Patients and Methods: In this prospective, non-comparative study, subjects aged 18 to 39 years with a history of unsuccessful previous astigmatism contact lens wear were recruited. Subjects were allocated and fitted with varying astigmatism powers of the Dailies Total1 Results: Sixty-five subjects (130 eyes) completed the study, of which 50 were female, and 15 were male, with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 29.5 ± 5 years. Overall, 87.69% of the subjects reported a positive rating for comfort and 92.31% for satisfaction with vision. 78% of respondents reported positive ratings for comfort throughout the day and 55% at the end of the day. Comfort while working on the computer and utilizing a cellphone was rated at 80% and 86%, respectively. 85% either agreed or strongly agreed that the lenses provided clear vision throughout the day, and 71% at the end of the day. Positive ratings for vision while on the computer and while using a cellphone were 87% and 91%, respectively. Of all participants, based on comfort and vision, 58% favored continuing to wear the lenses after the study. Conclusion: The results suggest that Dailies Total1

Indexed as

astigmatismcontact lenscontact lens dropoutDailies Total1® for Astigmatism

Identifiers

PMID40224379
PMCPMC11988191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.