When biomarkers for major depressive disorder remain elusive.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Connectome Gradient-Based Subtyping of Major Depressive Disorder Reveals Distinct Neurobiological and Transcriptomic Signatures.Depression and anxiety · 2026
   Article
2. Depressive symptoms, oral health behaviors, and self-reported oral health conditions among Chinese university students: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026
   Article
3. Gepirone for Major Depressive Disorder: From Pharmacokinetics to Clinical Evidence: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
   Review
4. Global Trends in the Epidemiologic Burden of Anxiety Disorders Among Women of Childbearing Age (1990-2021): Associations with Sociodemographic Index.International journal of women's health · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.