Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224339›Full record

ReviewMediastinum (Hong Kong, China)2025

The role of positron emission tomography in mediastinal mass.

Audrey C Pendleton, Joshua R Sonett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Audrey C PendletonDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joshua R SonettDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediastinal masses are a common finding in patients and can represent a diagnostic challenge for thoracic surgeons. The differential diagnosis for these masses is broad and ranges from benign solid or cystic lesions to aggressive cancers. They can present with vague symptoms, but these masses are often found incidentally in asymptomatic people. Patients with mediastinal masses should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team of specialists, including thoracic surgeons. Determining the etiology of the mass is essential since this heavily determines the management and prognosis. The work up involves clinical evaluation, laboratory work and always involves imaging, but deciding which imaging modality will offer the most information about the lesions and guide management is not always clear. The most common imaging studies for mediastinal masses are computed tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The role of PET scans in the work up of these masses is not well-established, but these scans have been shown to be especially useful in certain circumstances and can help guide further work up and decision making. This review article evaluates how and when PET scans can be used to guide work up and management in a variety of mediastinal masses.

Indexed as

lymphomamediastinal massPositron emission tomography (PET)thymoma

Identifiers

PMID40224339
PMCPMC11982981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.