Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224318›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors.

Lisa J Kroon, Ivo I de Vos, Charlotte F Kweldam, Monique J Roobol, Geert J L H van Leenders, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Anser Prostate Cancer Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa J KroonDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo I de VosDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte F KweldamDepartment of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert J L H van LeendersDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roderick C N van den BerghDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anser Prostate Cancer Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with systematic biopsy of the prostate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are associated with lower rates of upgrading and higher rates of downgrading between biopsy tissue and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG). Higher rates of downgrading could indicate overtreatment for some patients. We hypothesized that concordance rates between biopsy and RP are different per MRI tumor volume. We conducted an explorative retrospective study to identify the risk factors for downgrading, using RP specimens as the reference standard, in a large regional prostate collaboration. Among 616 patients, pathological concordance was seen in 58% and downgrading in 15%. The risk of downgrading was 18% for tumors of 0-10 mm, 14% for 10-20 mm, and 14% for >20 mm. In a multivariable analysis among patients with targeted biopsy GG ≥2, with covariates including clinical tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximal MRI index lesion diameter, number of positive target biopsies, and GG at targeted biopsy, the statistically significant predictors for downgrading were PSA, maximum MRI index lesion diameter, and target biopsy GG. A lower risk of downgrading was seen in larger tumors (odds ratio per millimeter 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.00, Patient summary: In this report, we examined risk factors that could explain why some patients have higher pathological grading at prostate biopsy than on the whole prostate specimen after surgical removal. We found that patients with prostate biopsies that are targeted at small lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and patients who had high biopsy grading had a higher risk of having lower grading of their surgical specimens.

Indexed as

DowngradingGleason gradeProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyTargeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40224318
PMCPMC11987626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.