ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ISUP Grade Group Migration Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Emerging Predictors.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Transgluteal MRI in-bore prostate biopsy in routine clinical practice: a contemporary-cohort-study from a german tertiary center.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Head-to-head Comparison of Multimodal Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection and Local Staging with Whole-mount Histopathology Reference.European urology oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with systematic biopsy of the prostate, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are associated with lower rates of upgrading and higher rates of downgrading between biopsy tissue and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG). Higher rates of downgrading could indicate overtreatment for some patients. We hypothesized that concordance rates between biopsy and RP are different per MRI tumor volume. We conducted an explorative retrospective study to identify the risk factors for downgrading, using RP specimens as the reference standard, in a large regional prostate collaboration. Among 616 patients, pathological concordance was seen in 58% and downgrading in 15%. The risk of downgrading was 18% for tumors of 0-10 mm, 14% for 10-20 mm, and 14% for >20 mm. In a multivariable analysis among patients with targeted biopsy GG ≥2, with covariates including clinical tumor stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximal MRI index lesion diameter, number of positive target biopsies, and GG at targeted biopsy, the statistically significant predictors for downgrading were PSA, maximum MRI index lesion diameter, and target biopsy GG. A lower risk of downgrading was seen in larger tumors (odds ratio per millimeter 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.00, Patient summary: In this report, we examined risk factors that could explain why some patients have higher pathological grading at prostate biopsy than on the whole prostate specimen after surgical removal. We found that patients with prostate biopsies that are targeted at small lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and patients who had high biopsy grading had a higher risk of having lower grading of their surgical specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.