ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Optimizing Screening Performance for the Risk of Hyperoxaluria and Urolithiasis Using the Urinary Oxalate/Creatinine Ratio: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: A case of acute kidney injury due to star fruit-infused liquor.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Re: Pierre Letourneau, Lara Cabezas, Aurélie De Mul, et al. Optimizing Screening Performance for the Risk of Hyperoxaluria and Urolithiasis Using the Urinary Oxalate/Creatinine Ratio: A Retrospective Analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci 2025;75:20-8.European urology open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and nephrolithiasis increases with higher levels of oxalate excretion in 24-h urine, warranting monitoring in specific populations, especially after malabsorptive bariatric surgery. However, implementation of systematic 24-h urine collection is challenging, so there is a need for alternative screening methods. Methods: Using retrospective data from patients evaluated for the risk of urolithiasis, we assessed different thresholds for the urinary oxalate/creatinine (UOx/Creat) ratio to optimize the screening performance for hyperoxaluria diagnosis and urolithiasis risk using lithogenic risk surrogates. Key findings and limitations: Among 1264 patients referred for urolithiasis, 38% were excluded because urine collection was considered incomplete. The remaining 786 individuals were included in our analysis, of whom 16% exhibited hyperoxaluria. A UOx/Creat screening threshold between 35 and 45 μmol/mmol demonstrated good performance, depending on the clinical weighting for false-negative versus true-positive results and the cost/benefit ratio. Conclusions and clinical implications: The UOx/Creat ratio is a promising tool in screening for hyperoxaluria-related complications. However, future research is needed to validate its performance and address the limitations identified to confirm its clinical relevance and effectiveness. Patient summary: Our study shows that a simple test to measure the ratio of oxalate to creatinine in urine can help in identifying people at risk of kidney stones, especially for patients who have had weight-loss surgery. The test showed good screening performance, but more research is needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.