Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224305›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2025

Maternal mortality ratios in low- and middle-income countries: a comparison of estimation methods and relationships with sociodemographic covariates.

Biraj Sharma, Roger Smith, Binod Bindu Sharma, Craig Pennell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Biraj SharmaSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia (B Sharma, Smith, and Pennell).
Roger SmithSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia (B Sharma, Smith, and Pennell).
Binod Bindu SharmaMinistry of Health, Gandaki Province, Pokhara, Nepal (BB Sharma).
Craig PennellSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia (B Sharma, Smith, and Pennell).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal mortality is most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, especially those from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. The Sustainable Development Goal 3.1 aims to reduce global maternal mortality by 2030 to <70 per 100,000 live births globally and <140 per 100,000 live births at the national level. For maternal mortality ratio estimations, the World Health Organization recommends a census in low- and middle-income countries that lack civil registration and vital statistics; however, other methods have also been used.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare maternal mortality ratio estimating methods and maternal mortality ratio trends over time. Associations between sociodemographic variables in low- and middle-income countries and maternal mortality ratios are described and compared between countries projected to meet or fall short of Sustainable Development Goal 3.1. STUDY

designPublications from the World Health Organization and the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group were used to identify countries that reported maternal mortality ratio estimates at least twice since 2004 using census, noncensus, or both approaches. Maternal mortality ratios were extracted from the Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group, and covariates associated with maternal mortality ratios were obtained from the Our World in Data and the Fragile States Index web pages. Group comparisons were performed using paired

resultsData were available for 45 countries for comparison; 21 countries had data from different maternal mortality ratio estimation methods, and 42 countries reported maternal mortality ratios using the same estimation method over time. Census maternal mortality ratio estimates were 83.2 per 100,000 live births higher than the estimates from noncensus methods, although this difference was statistically nonsignificant (

conclusionMaternal mortality ratio estimates are reproducible using different estimation methods in low- and middle-income countries. Only 30% of the low- and middle-income countries for which serial data are available are projected to meet the Sustainable Development Goal 3.1. Maternal mortality ratios are significantly lower in countries with sociodemographic characteristics that indicate a higher status for women.

Indexed as

maternal deathsmaternal mortality ratios in low- and middle-income countriessociodemographic factorsSustainable Development Goal 3.1

Identifiers

PMID40224305
PMCPMC11994042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.