ArticleOTO open
Disparities in Dysphagia Care Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- South African speech-language therapists' views on dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the incidence of dysphagia among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and assess disparities in utilization of speech-language pathology (SLP) services across different demographic groups. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Analysis of data from the TriNetX global health network, comprising over 125 million deidentified electronic health records worldwide. Methods: HNC patients diagnosed with oral, oropharyngeal, laryngeal, or nasopharyngeal cancer with and without dysphagia between January 1, 2004 and October 30, 2024 were identified. Patients were divided into two cohorts for comparison: those who received SLP services after dysphagia diagnosis and those who did not. The association of demographic characteristics (sex, ethnicity, and race) with SLP services were analyzed. Results: Of 269,629 HNC patients, 28.8% (n = 77,562) were diagnosed with dysphagia. Significant disparities were found: female and non-White patients were less likely to be diagnosed with dysphagia. Once diagnosed, female, Hispanic/Latino, and non-White patients were also significantly less likely to receive SLP services compared to female, Hispanic/Latino, and non-White patients. Overall, only 38.8% of patients with dysphagia received SLP services. Conclusion: This study highlights significant sex, ethnic, and racial disparities in dysphagia diagnosis and SLP service utilization among HNC patients. Furthermore, SLP services are underutilized. There is a need for targeted interventions to increase dysphagia prevention and surveillance and ensure equitable access to dysphagia care, improving outcomes for all HNC survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.