ArticleOTO open
Augmented Reality Navigation in Craniomaxillofacial/Head and Neck Surgery.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of surgical visualization headset in dental education for preclinical bone augmentation surgery.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Maxillofacial Surgery: Data Availability and Evidence Maturity.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- From Computer-Assisted Surgery to Extended Reality: Research Trends, Global Collaboration, and Future Directions in Craniomaxillofacial Surgery.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Review
- The Current State of Intraoperative Imaging in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-driven perioperative risk stratification and complication management in craniomaxillofacial surgery: current progress and future directions.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Electromagnetic Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction Using Autologous Grafts: A Color-Coded Assistance for Precise Positioning of Bone Segments.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Assessment of Augmented Reality Glasses for Spatial Tracking and Intraoperative Annotation in Veterinary Surgery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to (1) develop an augmented reality (AR) navigation platform for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) and head and neck surgery; (2) apply it to a range of surgical cases; and (3) evaluate the advantages, disadvantages, and clinical opportunities for AR navigation. Study Design: A multi-center retrospective case series. Setting: Four tertiary care academic centers. Methods: A novel AR navigation platform was collaboratively developed with Xironetic and deployed intraoperatively using only a head-mounted display (Microsoft HoloLens 2). Virtual surgical plans were generated from computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging data and uploaded onto the AR platform. A reference array was mounted to the patient, and the virtual plan was registered to the patient intraoperatively. A retrospective review of all AR-navigated CMF cases since September 2023 was performed. Results: Thirty-three cases were reviewed and classified as either trauma, orthognathic, tumor, or craniofacial. The AR platform had several advantages over traditional navigation including real-time 3D visualization of the surgical plan, identification of critical structures, and real-time tracking. Furthermore, this case series presents the first-known examples of (1) AR instrument tracking for midface osteotomies, (2) AR tracking of the zygomaticomaxillary complex during fracture reduction, (3) mandibular tracking in orthognathic surgery, (4) AR fibula cutting guides for mandibular reconstruction, and (5) integration of real-time infrared visualization in an AR headset for vasculature identification. Conclusion: While still a developing technology, AR navigation provides several advantages over traditional navigation for CMF and head and neck surgery, including heads up, interactive 3D visualization of the surgical plan, identification of critical anatomy, and real-time tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.