Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224287›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025

An Investigation into the Current Landscape, Challenges, and Training Imperatives of Clinical Research Among Anesthesiologists in China.

Yingjie Du, Ruirong Chen, Lili Wu, Quan Chen, Tiankuo Yu, He Li, Guyan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingjie Du *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ruirong Chen *Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lili WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Quan ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, People's Republic of China.
Tiankuo YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
He LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Guyan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6957-6356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the status of anesthesiologists in clinical research in China, identify challenges, and propose strategies to improve research quality and anesthesiology services. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among registered clinical anesthesiologists in China from April to May 2023. The questionnaire, which was developed by a multidisciplinary team following a workshop, covered sociodemographic characteristics, clinical research status, skills, motivations, challenges, and training needs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression to examine the factors associated with research publications. Results: Of the 878 analyzed respondents, 85.08% showed positive attitudes towards clinical research, yet the publication rates were low (59.68% in Chinese, 14.24% in English). Professional title promotions (78.70%) and solving clinical problems (69.48%) were the primary motivators. The respondents reported needing training in statistical analysis (74.69%), research design (73.86%), and topic selection (72.34%). The self-reported deficiencies included ability (73.01%), time (69.93%), and funding (60.71%). Significant differences ( Conclusion: This study identified major obstacles in anesthesiologists' research engagement, including time constraints, skill deficits, and funding issues, despite high interest. Career advancement was the primary motivation for the study. This study emphasizes the need for enhanced training in statistics and research designs. Factors such as education, title, experience, and training independently impact publication output.

Indexed as

anesthesiologistsclinical researchclinical research challengesclinical research current landscapeclinical research training imperatives

Identifiers

PMID40224287
PMCPMC11992470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.