ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Electrocardiogram sampling frequency for the optimal performance of complexity analysis and machine learning models: Discrimination between patients with and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using sinus rhythm electrocardiograms.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agreement of the performance of equine electrocardiogram recording devices for ECG complexity analysis.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Detection of exercising ectopic atrial and ventricular beats using non-linear analysis of clinically normal racehorse electrocardiograms at rest or low-intensity exercise.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current clinical practice to diagnose atrial fibrillation (AF) requires repeated episodic monitoring and significantly underperform in their ability to detect AF episodes. Objective: There is therefore potential for artificial intelligence-based methods to assist in the detection of AF. Better understanding of the optimal parameters for this detection can potentially improve the sensitivity for detecting AF. Methods: Ten-second, 12-lead electrocardiogram signals were analyzed using complexity algorithms combined with machine learning techniques to predict patients who had a previously detected AF episode but had since returned to normal sinus rhythm. An investigation was performed into the impact of the sampling frequency of the electrocardiogram signal on the accuracy of the machine learning models used. Results: Using a single complexity algorithm showed a peak accuracy of 0.69 when using signals sampled at 125 Hz. In particular, it was noted that improved accuracy occurred when using lead V Conclusion: Based on these results, there is potential for 12-lead electrocardiogram signals to be recorded at 125 Hz as standard and used in conjunction with complexity analysis to aid in the detection of patients with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.