Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40224254›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Electrocardiogram sampling frequency for the optimal performance of complexity analysis and machine learning models: Discrimination between patients with and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using sinus rhythm electrocardiograms.

Steven Creasy, Vadim Alexeenko, Gregory Y H Lip, Gary Tse, Philip J Aston, Kamalan Jeevaratnam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven CreasyDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Vadim AlexeenkoDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gary TseCardiovascular Analytics Group, PowerHealth Limited, Hong Kong, China.
Philip J AstonDepartment of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Kamalan JeevaratnamDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The current clinical practice to diagnose atrial fibrillation (AF) requires repeated episodic monitoring and significantly underperform in their ability to detect AF episodes. Objective: There is therefore potential for artificial intelligence-based methods to assist in the detection of AF. Better understanding of the optimal parameters for this detection can potentially improve the sensitivity for detecting AF. Methods: Ten-second, 12-lead electrocardiogram signals were analyzed using complexity algorithms combined with machine learning techniques to predict patients who had a previously detected AF episode but had since returned to normal sinus rhythm. An investigation was performed into the impact of the sampling frequency of the electrocardiogram signal on the accuracy of the machine learning models used. Results: Using a single complexity algorithm showed a peak accuracy of 0.69 when using signals sampled at 125 Hz. In particular, it was noted that improved accuracy occurred when using lead V Conclusion: Based on these results, there is potential for 12-lead electrocardiogram signals to be recorded at 125 Hz as standard and used in conjunction with complexity analysis to aid in the detection of patients with AF.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationComplexity analysisElectrocardiogramMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID40224254
PMCPMC11993800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.