ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Case Report: Personalized diagnosis and treatment strategies for three cases of cancer of unknown primary based on molecular testing techniques.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a malignancy characterized by metastatic disease at diagnosis with an unidentified primary site, accounting for 3-5% of all cancers. Despite significant advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment in recent years, CUP management has been challenging due to its complexity and heterogeneity; therefore, its prognosis remains poor. This report presents three cases of CUP. The first case involved a 59-year-old female whose abdominal metastatic cancer was identified to be originating from a primary cervical cancer using a 90-gene panel; the disease was controlled with targeted immunotherapy. The second case was a 56-year-old male with cervical lymph node metastatic cancer; genetic testing suggested renal cancer as the primary site, and dual-targeted therapy resulted in approximately 28% tumor reduction. The third case involved a 71-year-old female with subcutaneous metastatic cancer, which was confirmed by genetic profiling to be related to breast cancer; she achieved stable disease after chemotherapy. Diagnosis and treatment of these three CUP cases demonstrated that molecular testing could significantly improve treatment outcomes and extend patient survival. Precision medicine based on molecular detection has shown substantial value in identifying the primary site of CUP, developing personalized treatment plans, and managing the disease. However, treatment costs and patient compliance remain challenging, necessitating further research to optimize both diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.