ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Accuracy and safety of real-time navigation during insertion of temporary anchorage devices - A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Temporary anchorage device (TAD) is one of the applications of dental implants that facilitate orthodontic treatment. However, there are possible complications in TAD surgery with the freehand technique. Navigation has been used in dental implantation with acceptable results. There has been no published study on the use of real-time navigation for TAD insertion. Materials and methods: This was a split-mouth design randomized clinical trial in which the control group used a surgical guide (N = 16) for TAD insertion surgery and the experimental group used navigation for surgery (N = 16). We also performed a negative control by retrospective database survey to evaluate the freehand technique (N = 29). By comparing the platform center deviation and angular deviation of the control group, experimental group, and negative control, we can draw conclusions about the accuracy and safety of TAD insertion surgery using each method. Results: The platform center deviation in the surgical guide group and the navigation group showed a statistical difference ( Conclusion: The clinical use of real-time navigation in the insertion of TAD offers no more significant advantages than the freehand technique in terms of position and angular control. No immediate complications requiring implant removal occurred in this study. The combined technique has shown a trend in accuracy and safety, but a larger number of samples are still needed for statistical analysis to draw a definitive conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.