ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Study of risk management for orthodontists' practice in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Risk management in the health-care industry is a systematic approach for mitigating potential risks and enhancing patient safety. This study examined orthodontists' perceptions of and attitudes toward risk management in Taiwan. The results provide clinical references informing policies for health-care institutions in Taiwan. Materials and methods: During the 2021 Taiwan Association of Orthodontics (TAO) annual meeting, a structured questionnaire was distributed to 143 randomly selected orthodontists. This questionnaire comprised 23 questions on demographics (5 questions), knowledge of risk management (5 questions), execution of and attitude toward risk management (8 questions), and adverse event experiences (7 questions). After the frequency distribution of each question was examined, demographics and participants' preferences were analyzed through chi-square and multiple regression tests. Results: Goodness-of-fit testing revealed no significant differences in sex or age between the participants and TAO members. Most of the orthodontists were employees (68.31%). Additionally, most of the orthodontists (90.14%) believed that a favorable doctor-patient relationship and high-quality orthodontic treatment are essential for mitigating the risks associated with orthodontic care. Moreover, 30.28% of the orthodontists reported AEs, and 38.73% reported foreign body ingestion by patients. No significant correlation was observed between demographics and risk management. Conclusion: The majority of orthodontists in Taiwan have a positive understanding of and attitude toward risk management. Factors such as sex, age, and clinical experience have a minimal influence on the implementation of risk management practices by Taiwanese orthodontists. These findings provide valuable clinical references for governmental organizations aiming to formulate policies related to orthodontic practice and risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.