ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Contemporary approaches to orthodontic treatment in complex mixed dentition cases: A comparison of clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric mainstream clear-aligner early orthodontic orders in Guangdong public tertiary hospitals: service patterns, service-duration tiers and order conversion.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Comparative Evaluation of Transverse Maxillary Arch Changes in Mixed Dentition with Clear Aligners vs Conventional Maxillary Expanders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Speech and mastication difficulties: Clear aligners versus conventional braces.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Efficacy of posterior teeth mesialization with invisalign in moderate anchorage cases.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined orthodontic treatment strategies for patients in the mixed dentition phase, with a focus on the advantages and limitations of clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances in addressing complex tooth movements. Herein, three cases were reported to illustrate the complementary strengths of these treatment modalities. In Case 1, presurgical orthodontics for a patient with a cleft lip and palate was performed using clear aligners, resulting in successful rotation correction and optimal alignment. In Case 2, a noninvasive approach involving a transpalatal arch and fixed appliances was used to manage a high labially impacted central incisor without the use of temporary anchorage devices (TADs). In Case 3, a combination of clear aligners and braces were used to resolve severe crowding and an impacted canine, achieving the desired outcomes without extractions. The findings underscore the ability of clear aligners to enhance oral hygiene and enable precise tooth movement through software simulations. The integration of clear aligners and fixed appliances demonstrated improved treatment efficiency and patient comfort. Additional clinical trials are warranted to refine rotation correction techniques and evaluate the efficacy of TAD-assisted traction for impacted teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.