Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223991›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Development and validation of multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics models for predicting tumor response to radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Shangqun Liu, Yan Lv, Liwen Duan, Chengcheng Wang, Helong Wang, Songliu Hu, Baptiste Abbar, Jianyu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shangqun Liu *Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Yan Lv *Oncology Department, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China.
Liwen DuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Chengcheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Helong WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Songliu HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Baptiste AbbarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne University, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Jianyu XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The significant heterogeneity of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) poses challenges for clinical decision-making. Although various predictive methods currently exist, there remains a lack of an accurate and comprehensive approach effectively assessing the response of LA-NSCLC patients to radiotherapy. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop a model based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features to predict tumor response following radiotherapy in patients with LA-NSCLC and to evaluate its clinical utility. Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent radiotherapy and had MRI scans performed prior to treatment from November 2018 to April 2024. The patients were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set in a ratio of 7:3. Tumor response, assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, classified complete or partial responses as regression sensitive (RS) and stable or progressive disease as regression resistant (RR). A total of 3,045 radiomic features were extracted and integrated from T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Feature selection was conducted using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Four machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and random forest, were utilized to construct radiomic models for individual and combined sequences, with the optimal model selected. The models were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 86 patients were included in this study, with 60 patients (RS: n=32, RR: n=28) in the training set and 26 patients (RS: n=14, RR: n=12) in the testing set. Among them, there were 45 males in the training set and 16 males in the testing set. Four, eight, six, and nine features were selected from the T1, T2, DWI sequences, and combined sequences, respectively. Among the four machine learning algorithms, the LR model demonstrated high accuracy and stability. The combined sequence model exhibited the highest predictive performance. The area under the curve (AUC) of the training set was 0.888 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.803-0.974], and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 83.3%, 92.9% and 75%. The AUC of the testing set was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.648-0.983), and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 73.1%, 91.7% and 57.1%. Calibration curve and DCA demonstrated that the combined sequence model possessed good predictive performance and clinical utility. Conclusions: The radiomics model developed using multisequence MRI demonstrates strong potential in predicting the radiotherapy response in patients with LA-NSCLC. Notably, the combined sequence model outperforming individual sequence models in both predictive accuracy and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Lung cancermagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)radiomicsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40223991
PMCPMC11986761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.