ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Concurrent versus sequential immune checkpoint inhibition in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Review
- Germline HLA-I genotypes predict pathologic response and survival outcomes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Association of the preoperative triglyceride-glucose index with postoperative atrial fibrillation following esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study with a focus on non-diabetic patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Bibliometric examination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: insights, trends, collaborative networks, and prospective directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Platelet Indices and ApoA1 as Predictive Markers in Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While neoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery remains standard for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), survival outcomes remain suboptimal. Refining multimodal neoadjuvant regimens (including chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and emerging immunotherapy) is critical to improving prognosis. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced ESCC, and to examine the correlation between tumor regression grade (TRG) and imaging evaluation. Methods: In total, 106 patients diagnosed with ESCC-only received a 21-day cycle of intravenous camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin. The efficacy was evaluated after two cycles, and the patients subsequently underwent tumor resection. All patients completed the full treatment regime and underwent surgery. Patients' treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, R0 resection rate, TRG, and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate were measured. The adverse events (AEs) were also documented. Results: The R0 resection (resection with microscopically negative margins) was 97.2% (103/106). The pCR (ypT0N0) rate was 39.6% (42/106), and 50% (53/106) of the patients had a complete response (CR) of the primary tumor but had residual disease in the lymph nodes (ypT0N+). The major pathologic response (MPR) rate was 49% (52/106). Preoperative imaging evaluation of the patients showed that 33% (35/106) had a CR, 34% (36/106) had a partial response (PR), 21.7% (23/106) had stable disease (SD), and 11.3% (12/106) had progressive disease (PD). Based on the postoperative TRG classification, 47.1% (50/106) of the patients had grade 0, 11.3% (12/106) had grade 1, 18% (19/106) had grade 2, and 23.6% (25/106) had grade 3. Conclusions: This study showed that camrelizumab-based neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy was effective in the treatment of locally advanced resectable ESCC. The treatment increased the likelihood of achieving a curative surgical outcome, and the side effects were generally manageable. The treatment warrants further investigation. Moreover, the TRG was found to be significantly associated with imaging assessment; these two approaches can be combined and employed to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.