Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223979›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Effect of needle aspiration for treatment of moderate to severe non-tension pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy.

Jong Hwan Jeong, Ho Cheol Kim, Jae Seung Lee, Chang-Min Choi, Wonjun Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jong Hwan JeongDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0902-2671
Ho Cheol KimDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-4858
Jae Seung LeeDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4130-1486
Chang-Min ChoiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2881-4669
Wonjun JiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7164-2770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) is a widely used technique for assessing parenchymal lung diseases. However, pneumothorax often occurs after TTNB and may sometimes require chest tube drainage. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple needle aspiration for treating moderate to severe non-tension pneumothorax following TTNB. Methods: This prospective, single-center pilot study conducted between May and November 2021. Participants with non-tension pneumothorax measuring >25% in size on radiography after TTNB were included. Simple needle aspirations were performed through the second intercostal space on the midclavicular line using a 16-gauge angio-catheter. Changes in the size of the pneumothorax were assessed using chest radiographs at 1 and 12 h postprocedure. Results: Seven patients with moderate to severe pneumothorax after TTNB were included. Needle aspirations were successful in all patients without complications. Pneumothoraces improved in five patients after needle aspiration, eliminating the need for chest tube drainage. However, in two patients, pneumothorax of a similar size persisted after needle aspiration and was subsequently resolved with chest tube drainage. The mean duration of hospital stay for the patients with successful needle aspiration was shorter (3.8 d) compared to those requiring chest tube drainage after failed needle aspiration (8 d). Two patients who underwent chest tube drainage reported pain [Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 4] and received analgesic drugs, while no pain (NRS 0) was reported after needle aspiration. Conclusions: Needle aspiration is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of moderate to severe non-tension pneumothorax following TTNB. It may reduce the need for chest tube insertion, shorten hospitalization duration, and decrease procedure-related pain and analgesic use.

Indexed as

Needle aspirationnon-tension pneumothoraxtransthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB)

Identifiers

PMID40223979
PMCPMC11986738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.