ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Effect of needle aspiration for treatment of moderate to severe non-tension pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) is a widely used technique for assessing parenchymal lung diseases. However, pneumothorax often occurs after TTNB and may sometimes require chest tube drainage. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple needle aspiration for treating moderate to severe non-tension pneumothorax following TTNB. Methods: This prospective, single-center pilot study conducted between May and November 2021. Participants with non-tension pneumothorax measuring >25% in size on radiography after TTNB were included. Simple needle aspirations were performed through the second intercostal space on the midclavicular line using a 16-gauge angio-catheter. Changes in the size of the pneumothorax were assessed using chest radiographs at 1 and 12 h postprocedure. Results: Seven patients with moderate to severe pneumothorax after TTNB were included. Needle aspirations were successful in all patients without complications. Pneumothoraces improved in five patients after needle aspiration, eliminating the need for chest tube drainage. However, in two patients, pneumothorax of a similar size persisted after needle aspiration and was subsequently resolved with chest tube drainage. The mean duration of hospital stay for the patients with successful needle aspiration was shorter (3.8 d) compared to those requiring chest tube drainage after failed needle aspiration (8 d). Two patients who underwent chest tube drainage reported pain [Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 4] and received analgesic drugs, while no pain (NRS 0) was reported after needle aspiration. Conclusions: Needle aspiration is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of moderate to severe non-tension pneumothorax following TTNB. It may reduce the need for chest tube insertion, shorten hospitalization duration, and decrease procedure-related pain and analgesic use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.