Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223937›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Practical implementation and impact of the 4R principles in ethnopharmacology: Pursuing a more humane approach to research.

Jimin Liu, Xiang Zai, Xiaqing Tian, Jiaxuan Li, Shipeng Yan, Taiyi Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jimin LiuInnovation Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Xiang ZaiCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
Xiaqing TianCollege of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Jiaxuan LiInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Shipeng YanCollege of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Taiyi WangInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnopharmacology, a discipline focused on studying the medicinal use of natural materials by humans, plays a crucial role in addressing challenges in modern drug development. However, the traditional 3R principle-Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement-have limitations in guiding the ethical management of animal experimentation, conducting animal studies, and utilizing animal-derived materials in ethnopharmacological research. To address these gaps, the field has introduced the 4R principles, which expand the original framework by adding "Responsibility." The Responsibility principle highlights the ethical obligation of researchers to consider the welfare of experimental animals during all procedures. It calls for researchers to take accountability for their actions and decisions, ensuring that they actively protect animal welfare and exhibit empathy across species. This principle reinforces the ethical foundation of ethnopharmacological research. To implement the 4R principles effectively, this article explores the dimensions of Reduction, Refinement, Replacement, and Responsibility in detail. For Reduction, strategies include minimizing animal use by developing optimized, efficient experimental designs, creating tissue banks to recycle animal samples, and improving success rates in animal modeling. These efforts collectively aim to enhance ethical standards while advancing scientific outcomes. In terms of Refinement, the goal is to minimize animal distress and pain by improving the experimental environment, refining operational procedures, ensuring strict control of experiments under anesthesia, and prioritizing non-invasive or minimally invasive techniques for data collection. For Replacement, the aim is to reduce the need for experimental animals by exploring alternative solutions. This includes substituting in vitro experiments for in vivo ones, using 3D organoids to replace animal organs, and applying deep learning technologies in ways that decrease animal use. The Responsibility principle focuses on enhancing researchers' ethical obligations toward animal welfare. This can be achieved by improving regulations and policies governing animal experimentation, providing ethical training for technical personnel, and promoting awareness of animal welfare and ethical practices. The introduction and implementation of the 4R principles provide valuable guidance for the ethical conduct of animal experimentation in ethnopharmacological research, offering new insights and methodologies that support the responsible use of animals in scientific studies.

Indexed as

4R principlesanimal ethicsanimal researchethnopharmacologyresponsibility

Identifiers

PMID40223937
PMCPMC11988206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.