Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40223919›Full record

ReviewBJA open2025

The use of intrathecal morphine in non-abdominal surgery: a scoping review.

Aart Jan W Teunissen, Lieke van Gastel, Robert J Stolker, Seppe A Koopman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aart Jan W TeunissenMaasstad Hospital, Anaesthesiology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lieke van GastelErasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Robert J StolkerErasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Seppe A KoopmanMaasstad Hospital, Anaesthesiology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal morphine can reduce pain and opioid requirements needed for postoperative pain relief. It can potentially aid in the effectiveness of enhanced recovery protocols in non-abdominal surgery. However, concerns about side-effects may have hindered its use. This scoping review evaluates the effectiveness, appropriate dosage, and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine in non-abdominal surgery. Methods: We systematically searched for randomised controlled trials examining the use of intrathecal morphine in non-abdominal surgery. Results: The search identified 75 trials involving 4685 patients. We undertook a scoping review of these randomised controlled trials, including bias assessments, to comprehensively analyse the effectiveness and side-effects of intrathecal morphine. The findings indicate that intrathecal morphine reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption after spinal surgery, thoracic surgery, and orthopaedic lower extremity surgery. However, it was associated with an increased incidence of itching, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and urinary retention, particularly in orthopaedic procedures. Delayed respiratory depression was absent with low to moderate doses (<500 μg) in the reviewed studies. Conclusions: This review supports the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine in non-abdominal surgery. However, the benefits must be carefully weighed against potential side-effects that could lead to prolonged hospital stays. Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO-registry CRD42021233936.

Indexed as

intrathecal morphineorthopaedic surgerypostoperative nausea and vomitingprurituspulmonary complicationsspine surgerythoracic surgeryurinary retention

Identifiers

PMID40223919
PMCPMC11987639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.