ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025
Impact of Growing Rod Surgery for Early-Onset Scoliosis on Cervical Sagittal Alignment.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Design: Single-institution retrospective study. Objective: To assess the impact of growing rods (GRs) on postoperative cervical sagittal alignment in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Summary of Background Data: Cervical sagittal malalignment is associated with neck and cervical spine dysfunction. The impact of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on postoperative changes in cervical spine alignment has been reported by studies. Nevertheless, research on sagittal and spinopelvic parameters in patients with EOS is limited. Methods: In this study, 28 patients who underwent GR and were followed up until final fusion or bone maturity were included. Standing whole-spine radiographs obtained before GR, after the initial GR surgery, and at the final follow-up were utilized to measure the radiographic parameters. Patients with one or more of the previously reported poor prognostic factors were included in the cervical malalignment (CM) group ( Results: No significant change in sagittal alignment between preoperative and final follow-up measurements was found. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the change in the C2-7 angle and T1 slope (T1S) or thoracic kyphosis and a negative correlation between the change in the C2-7 angle and T1S minus C2-7 angle (T1S-CL). The percentage of patients in the CM group increased from 25% preoperatively to 46% at the final follow-up but without significant change. The CM group had significantly smaller preoperative C2-7 angles and lumbar lordosis (LL) and larger T1S-CL and pelvic incidence minus LL (PI-LL) values than the non-CM group. Conclusion: Smaller preoperative C2-7 angles and larger T1S-CL values were identified as risk factors for CM. Postoperative CM is more likely to occur in patients with reduced compensatory function to maintain preoperative cervical kyphosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.